We are implementing our new website. Some features may not work properly.
DataResearchDataXplainer ↗About
← Research
Gender · Technology-facilitated violence

Online Harm, Offline Silence

Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence and the Reporting Gap in Bangladesh.

Status
To be released soon
Survey
211 respondents
Survivors
76 respondents
Approach
Descriptive analysis
Research question

When online harm happens, where do survivors turn for help – and what keeps them from formal reporting?

36.0%Reported online harm
42.1%Survivors did not report
7.9%Reported to law enforcement
81.6%Survivors citing Facebook
What the evidence shows

A substantial gap between experiencing harm and using formal support channels

01

More than one-third of respondents reported online harm

Seventy-six of 211 respondents, or 36.0%, said they had experienced online harm or harassment that made them feel uncomfortable, frightened or harassed.

02

Fake accounts were the most common reported harm

Among the 76 survivors, 34 (44.7%) reported that someone had created a fake account in their name. False information or rumours and repeated harassment were also common.

03

Formal reporting was limited

Thirty-two survivors (42.1%) selected “not reported”. Only six (7.9%) reported to law enforcement, while 33 (43.4%) told a friend or family member.

04

Institutional trust and procedural knowledge were major barriers

Among non-reporters, 43.8% cited lack of faith in authorities and 37.5% said they did not know the procedure or place for making a complaint.

05

Support options were poorly known

In the later survey module, only 17 of 126 respondents said they knew an organization or institution they would feel confident approaching for assistance.

Method and limits

How the analysis should be read

Survey211 respondents; survivor-specific questions use n=76, while a later support and scenario module has 126 respondents.
AnalysisDescriptive analysis using the number of respondents who answered each relevant item.
LimitThe survey used a non-probability convenience sample and is heavily concentrated in Dhaka, so it should not be treated as nationally representative.
Full report · To be released soonHow Dataful researches →